Boyce v. Weber

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided September 29, 2020·No. 1:19-cv-03825·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

JASON BOYCE, : Plaintiff, : : 19-CV-3825 (JMF) -V- : : ORDER BRUCE WEBER and LITTLE BEAR, INC., : Defendants. : rrr nnn rn nn nn nnn nnn nn nn nnn nnn nnn nn nnn nnn nnn nnn JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge: Plaintiffs request to keep certain materials under seal or redacted, see ECF No. 123, is DENIED with respect to the following: e The proposed redactions in the parties’ briefs (ECF Nos. 75, 92, 101), except to the extent that they include the names of third parties (e.g., ECF No. 75, at 6 & n.9); and e Any pages or portions of Dr. Ho’s deposition transcript that was cited in the parties’ briefs, except to the extent that they include the names of third parties. The request is otherwise granted. See, e.g., Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41, 48 (2d Cir. 2019); Lugosch vy. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119-20 (2d Cir. 2006). To the extent that the parties need to file (or refile, as the case may be) on ECF any document to comply with this Memorandum Opinion and Order, the parties shall do so within one week. SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 29, 2020 New York, New York JESSE URMAN nited States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boyce v. Weber, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Boyce v. Weber (Boyce v. Weber) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
435 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 2006)
Brown v. Maxwell Dershowitz v. Giuffre
929 F.3d 41 (Second Circuit, 2019)