Boyce v. State
533 S.W.3d 280
This text of 533 S.W.3d 280 (Boyce v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Boyce v. State, 533 S.W.3d 280 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).
Opinion
Order
Demetrius L. Boyce appeals, following an evidentiary hearing, the denial of his amended Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Boyce argues that his trial counsel was ineffective in failing to seek suppression of the victim’s pre-trial and in-court identifications of Boyce as the person who committed the crimes. Finding no error of law, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
533 S.W.3d 280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boyce-v-state-moctapp-2017.