Boyce v. Russell

2 Cow. 444
New York Supreme Court·Decided February 15, 1824·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The town collector has ño right to pAy off claims upon the county in this manner. Hé must pay all the ihoñey which he collects to the county treasürér, éxcépt in those cases wherein he is otherwise directed by statute. Doty might have had his action against the treasurer had he refused to pay him without sufficient cause. The rule is, that when the party has a remedy by action, this Court will not interfere by mandamus. Boyce does not come for relief as a public officer ; for he has travelled beyond the line of his duty ; and we must regard his acts as those of Any other individual;

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boyce v. Russell, 2 Cow. 444 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1824).

2 Cow. 444 (Boyce v. Russell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. Port Chester Savings Bank v. Cromwell
45 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 384 (New York Supreme Court, 1885)
State ex rel. Bornefeld v. Rombauer
46 Mo. 155 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1870)
People Ex Rel. Fiedler v. Mead
24 N.Y. 114 (New York Court of Appeals, 1861)
People Ex Rel. Mygatt v. Supervisors of Chenango County
11 N.Y. 563 (New York Court of Appeals, 1854)