Boyce v. Morgan
This text of 3 Cai. Cas. 133 (Boyce v. Morgan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN ERROR on certiorari, upon an agreement entered into, on the 28th of December, not to sue a third person, the gravamen was laid, that he since that time had sued, and the summons was dated on the day of the agreement, On this, the defendant below insisted on a nonsuit ; but the plaintiff refusing to submit to it, a verdict was given in his favour. It was now contended, that the levying the plaint was the commencement of the suit; but the court, on the authority of Lowry v. Lawrence, 1 N. Y. T. R. 69, ruled, that issuing the summons, or warrant, was the beginning of the action, and reversed the judgment; the suit appearing on the face of the record, to have been instituted previous to any cause of action accrued.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Cai. Cas. 133, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boyce-v-morgan-nysupct-1805.