Boyce v. Francis
This text of 56 Miss. 573 (Boyce v. Francis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case falls within the principle announced in Mhoon v. Wilkerson, Exr., 47 Miss. 633, and Kimbrough v. Curtis et al., 50 Miss. 117 ; and laying out of view the partition of the lands of Boyce & Carter, set forth in the bill, a case is presented which entitles complainant to a decree.
The notes are not barred, because the bill shows that no administration has been had on the estate of Francis, their maker. Code, sect. 2162.
Decree reversed, demurrer to amended and original bill overruled, and cause remanded for defendants to answer in thirty days after the mandate herein shall have been filed in the court below.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 Miss. 573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boyce-v-francis-miss-1879.