Boyce v. Burns
This text of 54 A.D.2d 748 (Boyce v. Burns) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated February 19, 1976, which granted respondents’ motion for leave to serve an amended answer. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Appellants failed to demonstrate that granting leave to serve an amended answer would result in a "clear and disabling prejudice” to them (see Dransfield v Eastern Seaboard Warehouse Corp., 43 AD2d 569, 570). Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Latham, Shapiro and Hawkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
54 A.D.2d 748, 387 N.Y.S.2d 716, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boyce-v-burns-nyappdiv-1976.