Boyce v. Boyce
2 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 24, 1842 N.Y. LEXIS 451
This text of 2 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 24 (Boyce v. Boyce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Boyce v. Boyce, 2 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 24, 1842 N.Y. LEXIS 451 (N.Y. 1842).
Opinion
Divorce case. The chancellor decided in this case that a defendant who suffers the complainant’s bill to be taken as confessed against him, has no right to appeal from the decree on the ground that the evidence before the master was not sufficient to prove the facts charged.
Decree appealed from affirmed with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 24, 1842 N.Y. LEXIS 451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boyce-v-boyce-nychanct-1842.