Boyce v. Boyce
2 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 24, 1842 N.Y. LEXIS 451
Opinion
Divorce case. The chancellor decided in this case that a defendant who suffers the complainant’s bill to be taken as confessed against him, has no right to appeal from the decree on the ground that the evidence before the master was not sufficient to prove the facts charged.
Decree appealed from affirmed with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Boyce v. Boyce, 2 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 24, 1842 N.Y. LEXIS 451 (N.Y. 1842).
2 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 24 (Boyce v. Boyce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.