Boxley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Boxley v. State

352 S.W.3d 683, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1532, 2011 WL 5553779

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 15, 2011

DocketED 95794

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 352 S.W.3d 683 (Boxley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boxley v. State, 352 S.W.3d 683, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1532, 2011 WL 5553779 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

David Boxley (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The order of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI