Boxley v. State

352 S.W.3d 683, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1532, 2011 WL 5553779
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 15, 2011·No. ED 95794·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

David Boxley (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The order of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boxley v. State, 352 S.W.3d 683, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1532, 2011 WL 5553779 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

352 S.W.3d 683 (Boxley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lestina v. Treasurer of Missouri
352 S.W.3d 683 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)