Boxer v. Fort Peck Tribes

12 Am. Tribal Law 188
CourtFort Peck Appellate Court
DecidedMarch 25, 2015
DocketNo. 664
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 12 Am. Tribal Law 188 (Boxer v. Fort Peck Tribes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Fort Peck Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boxer v. Fort Peck Tribes, 12 Am. Tribal Law 188 (ftpeckctapp 2015).

Opinion

ORDER

This matter comes before the Court of Appeals on a Notice of Appeal from a finding of guilty of Assault of Law Enforcement Officer issued after a bench trial May 14, 2014. The matter has been fully briefed and argued.

The basis for the appeal was a conversation and agreement or understanding the Appellant had with Mary Lou Azure from the Prosecutor’s Office before trial. The understanding was, apparently, that the charge would be deferred and the matter would not proceed to trial.

The matter did, however, proceed to trial, with Prosecutor Weinberger representing the Fort Peck Tribes. Appellant appeared without counsel. Prosecutor Weinberger was not advised as to the earlier agreement and conversation that Appellant had with Mary Lou Azure. Appellant offered no defense at trial. Appellant was found guilty by the Court.

Later, upon a petition for Writ of Habe-as Corpus, the Prosecutor concurred with Appellant’s release from detention with credit for time served and suspension of the remaining time for probation. The Court granted this request over Appellant’s objection.

Appellant seeks dismissal of the complaint with prejudice in her appeal. We are a Court of review and cannot dismiss the complaint, as that is an action only the Trial Court can take upon remand.

It is also not within the scope of our review to determine what obligation Appellant might have had to inform the Court of her understanding and discussion concerning the disposition of the case with the Prosecutor’s Office, either prior to or during trial.

It is clear, however, that Appellant was not able to fully exercise her rights under the Indian Civil Rights Act (ICRA) due to her understanding that the matter would be resolved by a deferred prosecution agreement.

THEREFORE, IT IS THE ORDER OF THIS COURT:

1. The Conviction Order of May 14, 2014 is vacated and set aside.
[189]*1892. This matter is remanded to the Fort Peck Tribal Court for such further action as the Court deems appropriate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Deserly v. Fort Peck Tribes
13 Am. Tribal Law 459 (Fort Peck Appellate Court, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 Am. Tribal Law 188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boxer-v-fort-peck-tribes-ftpeckctapp-2015.