Box v. State

161 S.W.3d 897, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 598, 2005 WL 895753
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 19, 2005
DocketED 84869
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 161 S.W.3d 897 (Box v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Box v. State, 161 S.W.3d 897, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 598, 2005 WL 895753 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Box (“movant”) appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15 on the merits without an evidentiary hearing. Movant claims he was denied effective assistance of counsel because his counsel failed to investigate and present evidence from a witness.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Box v. State
190 S.W.3d 536 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
161 S.W.3d 897, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 598, 2005 WL 895753, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/box-v-state-moctapp-2005.