Box v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Box v. Board of Education

60 A.D.2d 651, 401 N.Y.S.2d 745, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14650

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 27, 1977

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 60 A.D.2d 651 (Box v. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Box v. Board of Education, 60 A.D.2d 651, 401 N.Y.S.2d 745, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14650 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review a determination of the respondent Chancellor of the Board of Education of the City of New York, dated November 27, 1974, which terminated petitioner’s employment as a probationary teacher, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered September 17, 1976, which dismissed the petition. Proceeding remitted to Special Term to hear and report expeditiously, with findings of fact, on the issue of the adequacy and extent of the record forwarded to the respondent chancellor for his review of the recommendation of the chancellor’s committee pursuant to section 105a of the by-laws of the board of education, and appeal held in abeyance in the interim. Upon this record we are unable to determine whether the chancellor had a full and proper record of the proceedings which preceded his review before him at the time he made his determination. A remand is necessary in order to resolve this factual issue. Hopkins, J. P., Rabin, Shapiro and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review a determination of the respondent Chancellor of the Board of Education of the City of New York, dated November 27, 1974, which terminated petitioner’s employment as a probationary teacher, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered September 17, 1976, which dismissed the petition. Proceeding remitted to Special Term to hear and report expeditiously, with findings of fact, on the issue of the adequacy and extent of the record forwarded to the respondent chancellor for his review of the recommendation of the chancellor’s committee pursuant to section 105a of the by-laws of the board of education, and appeal held in abeyance in the interim. Upon this record we are unable to determine whether the chancellor had a full and proper record of the proceedings which preceded his review before him at the time he made his determination. A remand is necessary in order to resolve this factual issue. Hopkins, J. P., Rabin, Shapiro and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 A.D.2d 651, 401 N.Y.S.2d 745, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/box-v-board-of-education-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack