Box Elder Power & Light Co. v. Brigham City

220 U.S. 603, 31 S. Ct. 716, 55 L. Ed. 604, 1911 U.S. LEXIS 1709
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 13, 1911
DocketNo. 94
StatusPublished

This text of 220 U.S. 603 (Box Elder Power & Light Co. v. Brigham City) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Box Elder Power & Light Co. v. Brigham City, 220 U.S. 603, 31 S. Ct. 716, 55 L. Ed. 604, 1911 U.S. LEXIS 1709 (1911).

Opinion

Per Curiam,.

Dismissed

for want of jurisdiction. Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. McGrew, 188 U. S. 291, 308; Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 100; Kaufman v. Smith, 216 U. S. 610. Mr. Charles C. Dey, Mr. Hiram E. Booth and Mr. E. A. Walton for the plaintiff in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mutual Life Insurance v. McGrew
188 U.S. 291 (Supreme Court, 1903)
Farrell v. O'Brien
199 U.S. 89 (Supreme Court, 1905)
David Kaufman & Sons Company v. Smith
216 U.S. 610 (Supreme Court, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
220 U.S. 603, 31 S. Ct. 716, 55 L. Ed. 604, 1911 U.S. LEXIS 1709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/box-elder-power-light-co-v-brigham-city-scotus-1911.