BOWZER v. State
219 S.W.3d 783, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 562, 2007 WL 1052667
Opinion
ORDER
James Bowzer appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
BOWZER v. State, 219 S.W.3d 783, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 562, 2007 WL 1052667 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).
219 S.W.3d 783 (BOWZER v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Shockley
219 S.W.3d 783 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)