Bowron v. Sibert

Fifth Circuit

Bowron v. Sibert

218 F. 987, 133 C.C.A. 669, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1618

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedOctober 30, 1914

DocketNo. 2668

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 218 F. 987 (Bowron v. Sibert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bowron v. Sibert, 218 F. 987, 133 C.C.A. 669, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1618 (5th Cir. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A question is raised by the counsel for the appellee as to the scope of the review of the proceedings of the trial court which it is permissible to make under the appeal by which the case is brought into this court. A determination of that question is not necessary. The result is the same, whether the scope of the review is restricted, as claimed by the counsel for the appellee, or is broad enough to present the questions discussed by the counsel for the appellant. Assuming that those questions are presented for review, yet the result of an examination of the record is that we reach the conclusion that it does not disclose any ground for a reversal of the judgment. We do not concur in the view, urged by the counsel for the appellant, that the evidence adduced failed to support either count of the complaint. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

A question is raised by the counsel for the appellee as to the scope of the review of the proceedings of the trial court which it is permissible to make under the appeal by which the case is brought into this court. A determination of that question is not necessary. The result is the same, whether the scope of the review is restricted, as claimed by the counsel for the appellee, or is broad enough to present the questions discussed by the counsel for the appellant. Assuming that those questions are presented for review, yet the result of an examination of the record is that we reach the conclusion that it does not disclose any ground for a reversal of the judgment. We do not concur in the view, urged by the counsel for the appellant, that the evidence adduced failed to support either count of the complaint. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

218 F. 987, 133 C.C.A. 669, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowron-v-sibert-ca5-1914.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack