Bownes v. State

345 So. 2d 787
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 15, 1977
Docket76-462
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 345 So. 2d 787 (Bownes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bownes v. State, 345 So. 2d 787 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

345 So.2d 787 (1977)

Eugene S. BOWNES, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-462.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 15, 1977.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender and James R. Bean, III, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

*788 Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert L. Bogen, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal of an illegal sentence and we remand for resentencing.

This Appellant was convicted of a first degree misdemeanor, attempted burglary, and a second degree misdemeanor, petit larceny. On the first degree misdemeanor he was sentenced to one year in the county jail and three years probation after he had served six months of that imprisonment. Since the maximum jail term he could have received was one year the sentence was excessive by two years and six months. Heatherly v. State, 343 So.2d 54 (Fla. 4th DCA, Opinion filed February 25, 1977); Magnin v. State, 334 So.2d 638 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976); Watts v. State, 328 So.2d 223 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976); Moore v. State, 324 So.2d 690 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976).

As to the second degree misdemeanor the maximum imprisonment is 60 days. The court sentenced him to two years probation consecutive to the first sentence, after he had served a concurrent 60 days in the county jail with credit for time served awaiting trial and sentencing. The probation of two years after the 60 days incarceration is illegally excessive.

As one of the conditions of the Appellant's probation he was to "draw no unemployment compensation while on probation." This is "an unnecessary restriction upon the valid exercise of a valuable right" and therefore should be removed. Coulson v. State, 342 So.2d 1042 (Fla. 4th DCA, Opinion filed February 18, 1977).

REVERSED and REMANDED for resentencing.

MAGER, C.J., and ALDERMAN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Russell
835 P.2d 1326 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 1991)
State v. Drumwright
367 So. 2d 256 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
State v. Sudol
357 So. 2d 761 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Gray v. State
356 So. 2d 848 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
State v. Wilcox
351 So. 2d 89 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
Ago
Florida Attorney General Reports, 1977
State Ex Rel. Washington v. Rivkind
350 So. 2d 575 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
345 So. 2d 787, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bownes-v-state-fladistctapp-1977.