Bowne v. Brown

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania

Bowne v. Brown

3 F. Cas. 1088, 2 Wash. C. C. 271

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania

DecidedOctober 15, 1808

StatusPublished

This text of 3 F. Cas. 1088 (Bowne v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bowne v. Brown, 3 F. Cas. 1088, 2 Wash. C. C. 271 (circtdpa 1808).

Pincite

Opinion

In these cases, where the plaintiff [Bowne’s Lessee] has recovered at law against the several defendants, THE COURT decided (PETERS, District Judge, absent) that the costs of the bill of discovery, brought by the defendants for their own advantage, and which, having had its effect, has been dismissed, should be borne by the plaintiffs in that suit THE COURT did not determine how this point would be, if the plaintiffs had failed at law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In these cases, where the plaintiff [Bowne’s Lessee] has recovered at law against the several defendants, THE COURT decided (PETERS, District Judge, absent) that the costs of the bill of discovery, brought by the defendants for their own advantage, and which, having had its effect, has been dismissed, should be borne by the plaintiffs in that suit THE COURT did not determine how this point would be, if the plaintiffs had failed at law.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 F. Cas. 1088, 2 Wash. C. C. 271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowne-v-brown-circtdpa-1808.