Bowne v. Brown

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania

Bowne v. Brown

3 F. Cas. 1088, 2 Wash. C. C. 271

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania·Decided October 15, 1808·Published

Opinion

In these cases, where the plaintiff [Bowne’s Lessee] has recovered at law against the several defendants, THE COURT decided (PETERS, District Judge, absent) that the costs of the bill of discovery, brought by the defendants for their own advantage, and which, having had its effect, has been dismissed, should be borne by the plaintiffs in that suit THE COURT did not determine how this point would be, if the plaintiffs had failed at law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In these cases, where the plaintiff [Bowne’s Lessee] has recovered at law against the several defendants, THE COURT decided (PETERS, District Judge, absent) that the costs of the bill of discovery, brought by the defendants for their own advantage, and which, having had its effect, has been dismissed, should be borne by the plaintiffs in that suit THE COURT did not determine how this point would be, if the plaintiffs had failed at law.

Bowne v. Brown, 3 F. Cas. 1088, 2 Wash. C. C. 271 (circtdpa 1808).

Pincite

3 F. Cas. 1088 (Bowne v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.