Bown v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bown v. State

644 So. 2d 131, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10023, 1994 WL 567752

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 19, 1994·No. No. 93-3411·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal from the trial court’s summary denial of B own’s rule 3.850 motion as untimely. The motion was filed more than two years after appellant’s conviction and more than two years after the opinion in State v. District Court of Appeal, First District, 569 So.2d 439 (Fla.1990). The trial court correctly denied the motion as untimely under rule 3.850(b), Fla.R.Crim.P. We therefore AFFIRM. Rodriguez v. State, 637 So.2d 934 (Fla.2d DCA), rev. denied, — [132]*132So.2d-(Fla. Aug. 30,1994) (table, no. 83-711; not yet published).

BOOTH, MICKLE and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal from the trial court’s summary denial of B own’s rule 3.850 motion as untimely. The motion was filed more than two years after appellant’s conviction and more than two years after the opinion in State v. District Court of Appeal, First District, 569 So.2d 439 (Fla.1990). The trial court correctly denied the motion as untimely under rule 3.850(b), Fla.R.Crim.P. We therefore AFFIRM. Rodriguez v. State, 637 So.2d 934 (Fla.2d DCA), rev. denied, — [132]*132So.2d-(Fla. Aug. 30,1994) (table, no. 83-711; not yet published).

BOOTH, MICKLE and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Bown v. State, 644 So. 2d 131, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10023, 1994 WL 567752 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

644 So. 2d 131 (Bown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related