Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Bown v. State

Bown v. State

644 So. 2d 131, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10023, 1994 WL 567752
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 19, 1994
DocketNo. 93-3411
StatusPublished

This text of 644 So. 2d 131 (Bown v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bown v. State, 644 So. 2d 131, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10023, 1994 WL 567752 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal from the trial court’s summary denial of B own’s rule 3.850 motion as untimely. The motion was filed more than two years after appellant’s conviction and more than two years after the opinion in State v. District Court of Appeal, First District, 569 So.2d 439 (Fla.1990). The trial court correctly denied the motion as untimely under rule 3.850(b), Fla.R.Crim.P. We therefore AFFIRM. Rodriguez v. State, 637 So.2d 934 (Fla.2d DCA), rev. denied, — [132]*132So.2d-(Fla. Aug. 30,1994) (table, no. 83-711; not yet published).

BOOTH, MICKLE and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rodriguez v. State
637 So. 2d 934 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
State v. Dist. Ct. of Appeal, First Dist.
569 So. 2d 439 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
644 So. 2d 131, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10023, 1994 WL 567752, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bown-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.