Bowmaster v. Clair
959 A.2d 900, 598 Pa. 593, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 1781
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 15, 2008
DocketAppeal No. 970 MAL 2007
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 959 A.2d 900 (Bowmaster v. Clair) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bowmaster v. Clair, 959 A.2d 900, 598 Pa. 593, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 1781 (Pa. 2008).
Opinion
[594]*594 ORDER
AND NOW, this 15th day of October, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED. The issues, as stated by Petitioner are:
a. Where a minor child’s estate may be legally liable to pay medical expenses resulting from an injury, can the child sue the tortfeasor for reimbursement of those medical expenses?.
b. Did the Pennsylvania Legislature intend to permit a minor receiving medical assistance to sue a tortfeasor for medical expenses when it enacted 62 P.S. § 1409(b)?
c. Is a minor child a “beneficiary” of medical assistance as defined in 62 P.S. § 1409(b)(13)?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
E.D.B. ex rel. D.B. v. Clair
987 A.2d 681 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2009)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
959 A.2d 900, 598 Pa. 593, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 1781, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowmaster-v-clair-pa-2008.