Bowman v. Zumpano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bowman v. Zumpano

128 A.D.3d 1333, 6 N.Y.S.3d 505

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 1, 2015

StatusPublished

This text of 128 A.D.3d 1333 (Bowman v. Zumpano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bowman v. Zumpano, 128 A.D.3d 1333, 6 N.Y.S.3d 505 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Patrick F. MacRae, J.), entered January 2, 2014. The order, among other things, granted the cross motion of defendants Kathi Wheatley and Randy K. Wheatley to dismiss the complaint against them.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated at Supreme Court. Present — Scudder, P.J., Lindley, Valentino and DeJoseph, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Patrick F. MacRae, J.), entered January 2, 2014. The order, among other things, granted the cross motion of defendants Kathi Wheatley and Randy K. Wheatley to dismiss the complaint against them.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated at Supreme Court. Present — Scudder, P.J., Lindley, Valentino and DeJoseph, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

128 A.D.3d 1333, 6 N.Y.S.3d 505, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowman-v-zumpano-nyappdiv-2015.