Bowman v. Wicks

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bowman v. Wicks. Read the opinion of the Court — 47 F. App'x 668
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 8, 2002·No. 02-7136·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7136

JOHN L. BOWMAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

A. WICKS, Sergeant; MARY COILBERT, Nurse; JACK LEE, Warden; GENE SHINAULT, Assistant Warden; DOC WATSON, Inmate Hearings,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-813-7)

Submitted: September 20, 2002 Decided: October 8, 2002

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John L. Bowman, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

John L. Bowman, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district

court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000)

complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (2000). We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s opinion and find that this appeal

is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See Bowman v. Wicks, No. CA-02-813-7 (W.D.

Va. July 12, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bowman v. Wicks, (4th Cir. 2002).

Bowman v. Wicks (Bowman v. Wicks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Screening
28 U.S.C. § 1915A