Bowman v. West Overland Fire Protection District

Missouri Court of Appeals

Bowman v. West Overland Fire Protection District

855 S.W.2d 409, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 695, 1993 WL 158435

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 18, 1993·No. No. 62351·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Employee appeals from a final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission. The Commission’s order is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Employee appeals from a final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission. The Commission’s order is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Bowman v. West Overland Fire Protection District, 855 S.W.2d 409, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 695, 1993 WL 158435 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

855 S.W.2d 409 (Bowman v. West Overland Fire Protection District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.