Bowman v. United Services Automobile Ass'n

923 So. 2d 1235, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 4180, 2006 WL 722169
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 23, 2006
DocketNo. 1D05-2636
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 923 So. 2d 1235 (Bowman v. United Services Automobile Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bowman v. United Services Automobile Ass'n, 923 So. 2d 1235, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 4180, 2006 WL 722169 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We conclude that competent, substantial evidence supports the trial court’s finding that a valid and enforceable settlement agreement existed. Accordingly, we affirm as to that issue. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction appellant’s challenge to the award of attorney’s fees because the order reserved jurisdiction to determine the amount. Accordingly, that portion of the order is nonfinal and nonappealable. See, e.g., Scullin v. City of Pensacola, 667 So.2d 215 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).

AFFIRMED IN PART and DISMISSED IN PART.

BARFIELD, WEBSTER and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

R.J. Reynolds Tobacco v. Ward
141 So. 3d 236 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
923 So. 2d 1235, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 4180, 2006 WL 722169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowman-v-united-services-automobile-assn-fladistctapp-2006.