BOWMAN v. STATE OF INDIANA

• Court: District Court, S.D. Indiana
• Decided: October 29, 2021
• Docket: 1:14-cv-00847
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

ERIC D. BOWMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 1:14-cv-00847-JMS-TAB ) STATE OF INDIANA, ) IMPD, ) ) Defendants. )

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SEAL Plaintiff Eric Bowman has filed a motion to seal [Filing No. 9] asserting that this case1 should be sealed in its entirety because the underlying arrest referenced in this case is more than 10 years old, the underlying arrest has been expunged, public disclosure of this case has negatively impacted his job search, and he is homeless and unemployed. Plaintiff's motion to seal is denied. Court filings are presumptively open to the public. See Hicklin Eng'g, L.C. v. Bartell, 439 F.3d 346, 348 (7th Cir. 2006) ("What happens in the federal courts is presumptively open to public scrutiny."); Dixon v. Jefferson Capital Sys. LLC, et al, No. 1:19-cv-02457-JMS-DLM, 2021 WL 4943059, at* 1 (S.D. Ind. Aug. 26, 2021) ("[G]enerally, unless there is a statutory basis for sealing, the existence of a recognized privilege, or a demonstration that harm would result from disclosure and that that particular harm should overcome the presumption of public access, sealing documents from the public record is not appropriate."); Kamakana v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1179 (9th Cir. 2006) ("[E]mbarrassment, incrimination, or exposure to further litigation will not, without more, compel the court to seal its records."). The fact that Plaintiff's arrest may have been expunged does not overcome this presumption, or otherwise justify sealing three separate civil cases in their entirety, particularly given that Plaintiff himself filed these cases. Date: 10/29/2021

lL. (hh Tim A. Baker United States Magistrate Judge Southern District of Indiana

Distribution: All ECF-registered counsel of record via email ERIC D. BOWMAN 1486 Stanford Drive Avon, IN 46123