Bowman v. State

537 P.2d 316, 91 Nev. 419
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided June 27, 1975·No. No. 8070·Published

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam:

Convicted of battery with a deadly weapon (NRS 200.481), appellant contends the evidence against him was insufficient.

Maria Valez identified appellant as the man who attacked her in a Las Vegas hotel, striking her on the head and face. The defendant then strangled Mrs. Valez with a cord and slashed her with a knife.

A hotel security officer apprehended appellant shortly thereafter, in a room not registered to him, and recovered a knife from his person. As the officer forced his way into the room, with gun drawn, he heard appellant say, “I did it; I did it. Don’t shoot; don’t shoot.” Later, after receiving Miranda warnings from a police officer called to the scene, appellant made other damaging statements.

We reject appellant’s sole assignment of error, believing this uncontroverted evidence ample to warrant his conviction.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bowman v. State, 537 P.2d 316, 91 Nev. 419 (Neb. 1975).

537 P.2d 316 (Bowman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 200.481
Nevada § 200.481