Bowman v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Bowman v. State

195 S.E. 217, 57 Ga. App. 265, 1938 Ga. App. LEXIS 559

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided February 3, 1938·No. 26683·Published

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The evidence amply authorized the verdict. The defendant introduced no testimony, and his statement was evidently rejected by the jury. Under the facts of the case, the special grounds of the motion for new trial (several of which are not complete and understandable within themselves) show no cause for another hearing of the case.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

The evidence amply authorized the verdict. The defendant introduced no testimony, and his statement was evidently rejected by the jury. Under the facts of the case, the special grounds of the motion for new trial (several of which are not complete and understandable within themselves) show no cause for another hearing of the case.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.

Bowman v. State, 195 S.E. 217, 57 Ga. App. 265, 1938 Ga. App. LEXIS 559 (Ga. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

195 S.E. 217 (Bowman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.