Bowman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 1, 2017·No. 2D16-5303·Published

Opinion

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

BRITTANY BOWMAN, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-5303 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________ )

Opinion filed September 1, 2017.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Tom Barber, Judge.

Brittany Bowman, pro se.

LaROSE, Chief Judge.

Affirmed without prejudice to whatever right the appellant may have to file

a timely and facially sufficient motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

NORTHCUTT and KHOUZAM, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bowman v. State, (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Bowman v. State (Bowman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.