Bowman v. State
This text of Bowman v. State (Bowman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
BRITTANY BOWMAN, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-5303 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________ )
Opinion filed September 1, 2017.
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Tom Barber, Judge.
Brittany Bowman, pro se.
LaROSE, Chief Judge.
Affirmed without prejudice to whatever right the appellant may have to file
a timely and facially sufficient motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.
NORTHCUTT and KHOUZAM, JJ., Concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bowman v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowman-v-state-fladistctapp-2017.