Bowman v. State
Opinion
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
BRITTANY BOWMAN, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-5303 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________ )
Opinion filed September 1, 2017.
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Tom Barber, Judge.
Brittany Bowman, pro se.
LaROSE, Chief Judge.
Affirmed without prejudice to whatever right the appellant may have to file
a timely and facially sufficient motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.
NORTHCUTT and KHOUZAM, JJ., Concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bowman v. State (Bowman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.