Bowman v. State

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 1, 2017
Docket2D16-5303
StatusPublished

This text of Bowman v. State (Bowman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bowman v. State, (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

BRITTANY BOWMAN, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-5303 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________ )

Opinion filed September 1, 2017.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Tom Barber, Judge.

Brittany Bowman, pro se.

LaROSE, Chief Judge.

Affirmed without prejudice to whatever right the appellant may have to file

a timely and facially sufficient motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

NORTHCUTT and KHOUZAM, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Bowman v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowman-v-state-fladistctapp-2017.