Bowman v. State
This text of 852 So. 2d 289 (Bowman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Appellant, Kelvin Bowman, appeals the summary denial of his belated Rule 3.850 post-conviction motion. Bowman’s motion is not only untimely, as it was filed well beyond two years after the judgment and sentence in his case became final, but is also successive, as he raises claims of trial court error and ineffective assistance of counsel which could have been raised in a prior 3.850 motion. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(b) and (f). Accordingly, his motion for post-conviction relief was properly denied.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
852 So. 2d 289, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 10131, 2003 WL 21511738, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowman-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.