Bowman v. State

852 So. 2d 289, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 10131, 2003 WL 21511738
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 3, 2003
DocketNo. 5D03-1729
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 852 So. 2d 289 (Bowman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bowman v. State, 852 So. 2d 289, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 10131, 2003 WL 21511738 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Appellant, Kelvin Bowman, appeals the summary denial of his belated Rule 3.850 post-conviction motion. Bowman’s motion is not only untimely, as it was filed well beyond two years after the judgment and sentence in his case became final, but is also successive, as he raises claims of trial court error and ineffective assistance of counsel which could have been raised in a prior 3.850 motion. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(b) and (f). Accordingly, his motion for post-conviction relief was properly denied.

AFFIRMED.

SAWAYA, C.J, MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Erickson
852 So. 2d 289 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
852 So. 2d 289, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 10131, 2003 WL 21511738, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowman-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.