Bowman v. State
852 So. 2d 289, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 10131, 2003 WL 21511738
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 3, 2003·No. No. 5D03-1729·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The Appellant, Kelvin Bowman, appeals the summary denial of his belated Rule 3.850 post-conviction motion. Bowman’s motion is not only untimely, as it was filed well beyond two years after the judgment and sentence in his case became final, but is also successive, as he raises claims of trial court error and ineffective assistance of counsel which could have been raised in a prior 3.850 motion. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(b) and (f). Accordingly, his motion for post-conviction relief was properly denied.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bowman v. State, 852 So. 2d 289, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 10131, 2003 WL 21511738 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).
852 So. 2d 289 (Bowman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Erickson
852 So. 2d 289 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)