Bowman v. Roe

62 Miss. 513
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1885
StatusPublished

This text of 62 Miss. 513 (Bowman v. Roe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bowman v. Roe, 62 Miss. 513 (Mich. 1885).

Opinion

Campbell, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The limitation contained in § 1685 of the Code of 1871, upon the right of the board of supervisors to sit, not exceeding six days, to examine the assessment rolls, was not 'removed by “An act to amend §§ 1684 and 1685 of the Revised Code of 1871 in relation to the returns of the assessment rolls,” approved March 6,1875, Acts, p. 50, and the action of the Board of Supervisors of "Warren County in the case before us was void for want of authority to be in session when it was had.

The act entitled “An act legalizing the return of assessment rolls, etc.,” approved July 31, 1875, Acts Special Session, p. 10, was not intended to cure illegal meetings by the boards of supervisors for action on assessment rolls. It was directed only to nondelivery of assessment rolls to the clerk within the prescribed time. Fanning v. Funches, 60 Miss. 541.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fanning v. Funches
60 Miss. 541 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1882)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 Miss. 513, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowman-v-roe-miss-1885.