Bowman v. Robb

6 Pa. 302
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJuly 15, 1847
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 6 Pa. 302 (Bowman v. Robb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bowman v. Robb, 6 Pa. 302 (Pa. 1847).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There were actually two seals on the face of each note — the one made by a printed stamp, and the other by an exterior circumflex of a pen. But even if that were not so, there was intrinsic evidence that Bowman had adopted the seal as it stood upon the paper, and the jury might possibly have disregarded the extrinsic evidence, had the two been incompatible. Let the judgment be affirmed for the reasons given in the charge.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lundvall v. Camp Hill School District
58 Pa. D. & C.2d 643 (Cumberland County Court of Common Pleas, 1972)
Brisbin v. Bogoly
39 A.2d 430 (U.S. District Court, 1944)
Hess's Estate
24 A. 676 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Pa. 302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowman-v-robb-pa-1847.