Bowman v. Pitsenberger

Supreme Court of Kansas

Bowman v. Pitsenberger

85 P. 1134, 74 Kan. 895, 1906 Kan. LEXIS 182

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedJune 9, 1906

DocketNo. 14,665

StatusPublished

This text of 85 P. 1134 (Bowman v. Pitsenberger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bowman v. Pitsenberger, 85 P. 1134, 74 Kan. 895, 1906 Kan. LEXIS 182 (kan 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The only question presented in this case is that the verdict is not sustained by the evidence. No objections are made to the admission or rejection of evidence and none to the instructions given to the jury.

This court cannot weigh or reconcile evidence. The conclusion reached by the jury was reasonable and fully justified by the testimony given. There is nothing to indicate mistake, passion, or prejudice. The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The only question presented in this case is that the verdict is not sustained by the evidence. No objections are made to the admission or rejection of evidence and none to the instructions given to the jury.

This court cannot weigh or reconcile evidence. The conclusion reached by the jury was reasonable and fully justified by the testimony given. There is nothing to indicate mistake, passion, or prejudice. The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

85 P. 1134, 74 Kan. 895, 1906 Kan. LEXIS 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowman-v-pitsenberger-kan-1906.