Bowman v. Parker Bowman Baking Co.

Connecticut Superior Court

Bowman v. Parker Bowman Baking Co.

2 Conn. Super. Ct. 22, 2 Conn. Supp. 22, 1935 Conn. Super. LEXIS 185

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedApril 30, 1935

DocketFile #44071

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Conn. Super. Ct. 22 (Bowman v. Parker Bowman Baking Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bowman v. Parker Bowman Baking Co., 2 Conn. Super. Ct. 22, 2 Conn. Supp. 22, 1935 Conn. Super. LEXIS 185 (Colo. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

McEVOY, J.

This motion is in connection with a letter dated March 22, 1935, written by Morgan R. Mooney, Esq., Labor Compliance Officer, which is marked Exhibit A * in Receiver’s motion as to alleged wage claims.

The basis of these claims seems to be that it is alleged that these various employees were employed by Parker Bowman Baking Company.

The alleged claims for wages do not grow out of an employment by Parker Bowman Baking Company but they arise out of the conduct of the business of that concern by the Receiver.

Under these circumstances the Receiver is not responsible nor liable for any of the payments set up in these claims and the Receiver is instructed not to pay any of these claims and to disallow them.

*

Exhibit A, pointed out that forty hours a week is the maximum as set by the baking industry code and that an investigation had indicated this had been violated. In advising them to file a claim for time and one-half, as provided by the code for overtime, he stated, “it is customary for the N.R.A. to adjust such violations, and it is the opinion of this office that you have a legal and enforceable claim for that amount. For this reason, I am advising that you file claim with the Superior Court.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI