Bowman v. Mutual Fire Insurance

52 A. 87, 203 Pa. 150, 1902 Pa. LEXIS 673
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 19, 1902·No. Appeal, No. 322·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The proof of notice of additional insurance was sufficient to go to the jury, and the question whether there was a waiver was properly submitted.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bowman v. Mutual Fire Insurance, 52 A. 87, 203 Pa. 150, 1902 Pa. LEXIS 673 (Pa. 1902).

52 A. 87 (Bowman v. Mutual Fire Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gregory v. Hoosier Casualty Co.
186 A. 278 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)
Brink v. Lackawanna Mutual Fire Insurance
90 Pa. Super. 527 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1927)
Stewart v. General Accident Insurance Co. of Philadelphia
39 Pa. Super. 396 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1909)
Smith v. West Branch Mutual Fire Insurance
31 Pa. Super. 29 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1906)