Bowman v. Mutual Fire Insurance
52 A. 87, 203 Pa. 150, 1902 Pa. LEXIS 673
Opinion
The proof of notice of additional insurance was sufficient to go to the jury, and the question whether there was a waiver was properly submitted.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bowman v. Mutual Fire Insurance, 52 A. 87, 203 Pa. 150, 1902 Pa. LEXIS 673 (Pa. 1902).
52 A. 87 (Bowman v. Mutual Fire Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gregory v. Hoosier Casualty Co.
186 A. 278 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)
Brink v. Lackawanna Mutual Fire Insurance
90 Pa. Super. 527 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1927)
Stewart v. General Accident Insurance Co. of Philadelphia
39 Pa. Super. 396 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1909)
Smith v. West Branch Mutual Fire Insurance
31 Pa. Super. 29 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1906)