Bowman v. Middleton

Court of Chancery of South Carolina

Bowman v. Middleton

1 S.C. Eq. 163

CourtCourt of Chancery of South Carolina

DecidedOctober 15, 1789

StatusPublished

This text of 1 S.C. Eq. 163 (Bowman v. Middleton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bowman v. Middleton, 1 S.C. Eq. 163 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1789).

Pincite

Opinion

On hearing Messrs. Moultrie and Pringle, solicitors for complainants, on a question for a new trial at common law, on an issue formerly directed and verdict found for defendant: And on hearing Mr. Parker, solicitor for defendant against the motion, ordered, that a trial at law be had de novo. The court also recommended that in consequence of a difference of opinion in the surveyors employed in surveying the lands in dispute, that other surveyors be called in»

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On hearing Messrs. Moultrie and Pringle, solicitors for complainants, on a question for a new trial at common law, on an issue formerly directed and verdict found for defendant: And on hearing Mr. Parker, solicitor for defendant against the motion, ordered, that a trial at law be had de novo. The court also recommended that in consequence of a difference of opinion in the surveyors employed in surveying the lands in dispute, that other surveyors be called in»

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 S.C. Eq. 163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowman-v-middleton-ctchansc-1789.