Bowman v. Middleton

1 S.C. Eq. 163
Court of Chancery of South Carolina·Decided October 15, 1789·Published

Opinion

On hearing Messrs. Moultrie and Pringle, solicitors for complainants, on a question for a new trial at common law, on an issue formerly directed and verdict found for defendant: And on hearing Mr. Parker, solicitor for defendant against the motion, ordered, that a trial at law be had de novo. The court also recommended that in consequence of a difference of opinion in the surveyors employed in surveying the lands in dispute, that other surveyors be called in»

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bowman v. Middleton, 1 S.C. Eq. 163 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1789).

1 S.C. Eq. 163 (Bowman v. Middleton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.