Bowman v. Knott

Fourth Circuit

Bowman v. Knott

267 F. App'x 214

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 23, 2008·No. No. 07-7100·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jimmy Bowman appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and conclude that the Appellee was entitled to derivative absolute judicial immunity. McCray v. Maryland, 456 F.2d 1, 5 (4th Cir.1972). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Jimmy Bowman appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and conclude that the Appellee was entitled to derivative absolute judicial immunity. McCray v. Maryland, 456 F.2d 1, 5 (4th Cir.1972). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Bowman v. Knott, 267 F. App'x 214 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

267 F. App'x 214 (Bowman v. Knott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related