Bowman v. Knott
This text of Bowman v. Knott (Bowman v. Knott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-7100
JIMMY BOWMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
BISHOP KNOTT, Jr., individually and in his official capacity as Clerk of Prince George County Circuit Court,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
HELEN H. FAHEY, individually as Chairperson of the Virginia Parole Board; DARNLEY R. HODGE, individually as the Superintendent of the Riverside Regional Jail,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:06-cv-00309-REP)
Submitted: January 17, 2008 Decided: January 23, 2008
Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jimmy Bowman, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Jimmy Bowman appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and conclude that the Appellee was entitled to
derivative absolute judicial immunity. McCray v. Maryland, 456
F.2d 1, 5 (4th Cir. 1972). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bowman v. Knott, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowman-v-knott-ca4-2008.