Bowman v. Day
This text of 53 N.W. 113 (Bowman v. Day) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is unnecessary to set out the facts in this case, as there is nothing to show that an appeal has been taken to this court. We have repeatedly held that the fact that an appeal has been taken must affirmatively appear. Code, section 3178; rule of court, 98; Gleason v. Collett, 77 Iowa, 448; Schooley v. Globe Ins. Co., 76 Iowa, 78; Donnelly v. Cedar Co., 75 Iowa, 536; State v. Clossner, 84 Iowa, 401. The appeal being necessary to give this court jurisdiction, and none having been taken, the case must be dismissed. Talbort v. Noble, 75 Iowa, 167; Phillips v. Follet, 69 Iowa, 39; Farrell v. City of Muscatine, 85 Iowa, 753; Mandel v. Friedman, 85 Iowa 734. Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
53 N.W. 113, 86 Iowa 746, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowman-v-day-iowa-1892.