BOWMAN v. CINGULAR WIRELESS

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana
DecidedOctober 29, 2021
Docket1:04-cv-00510
StatusUnknown

This text of BOWMAN v. CINGULAR WIRELESS (BOWMAN v. CINGULAR WIRELESS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Indiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
BOWMAN v. CINGULAR WIRELESS, (S.D. Ind. 2021).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION ERIC BOWMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 1:04-cv-00510-RLY-TAB ) CINGULAR WIRELESS, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SEAL Plaintiff Eric Bowman has filed a motion to seal [Filing No. 38] asserting that this case1 should be sealed in its entirety because the underlying arrest referenced in this case is more than 10 years old, the underlying arrest has been expunged, public disclosure of this case has negatively impacted his job search, and he is homeless and unemployed. Plaintiff's motion to seal is denied. Court filings are presumptively open to the public. See Hicklin Eng'g, L.C. v. Bartell, 439 F.3d 346, 348 (7th Cir. 2006) ("What happens in the federal courts is presumptively open to public scrutiny."); Dixon v. Jefferson Capital Sys. LLC, et al, No. 1:19-cv-02457-JMS-DLM, 2021 WL 4943059, at *1 (S.D. Ind. Aug. 26, 2021) ("[G]enerally, unless there is a statutory basis for sealing, the existence of a recognized privilege, or a demonstration that harm would result from disclosure and that that particular harm should overcome the presumption of public access, sealing documents from the public record is not appropriate."); Kamakana v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1179 (9th Cir. 2006) ("[E]mbarrassment, incrimination, or exposure to further litigation will not, without more, compel the court to seal its records."). The fact that Plaintiff's arrest may have been expunged does not overcome this presumption, or otherwise justify sealing three separate civil cases in their entirety, particularly given that Plaintiff himself filed these cases. Moreover, this case (unlike the two others Plaintiff brought) does not make allegations relating to his arrest, but rather allege employment discrimination in his termination. Date: 10/29/2021

L. (Sh Tim A. Baker United States Magistrate Judge Southern District of Indiana

Distribution: All ECF-registered counsel of record via email ERIC BOWMAN Post Office Box 532970 Indianapolis, IN 46253

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
BOWMAN v. CINGULAR WIRELESS, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowman-v-cingular-wireless-insd-2021.