Bowman v. Bowman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bowman v. Bowman

504 So. 2d 808, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 930, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7502

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 3, 1987

DocketNo. 86-1693

StatusPublished

This text of 504 So. 2d 808 (Bowman v. Bowman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bowman v. Bowman, 504 So. 2d 808, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 930, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7502 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

HALL, Judge.

We find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding the wife rehabilitative alimony. The facts of this case do not warrant an award of permanent alimony at this time. However, should the wife not become rehabilitated prior to the expiration of the rehabilitative alimony period, she may file a petition to continue the rehabilitative alimony or convert it to permanent alimony. Lee v. Lee, 309 So.2d 26 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975).

Affirmed.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and SANDERLIN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HALL, Judge.

We find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding the wife rehabilitative alimony. The facts of this case do not warrant an award of permanent alimony at this time. However, should the wife not become rehabilitated prior to the expiration of the rehabilitative alimony period, she may file a petition to continue the rehabilitative alimony or convert it to permanent alimony. Lee v. Lee, 309 So.2d 26 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975).

Affirmed.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and SANDERLIN, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

504 So. 2d 808, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 930, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowman-v-bowman-fladistctapp-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack