Bowman v. Bowman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bowman v. Bowman

504 So. 2d 808, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 930, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7502

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 3, 1987·No. No. 86-1693·Published

Opinion

HALL, Judge.

We find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding the wife rehabilitative alimony. The facts of this case do not warrant an award of permanent alimony at this time. However, should the wife not become rehabilitated prior to the expiration of the rehabilitative alimony period, she may file a petition to continue the rehabilitative alimony or convert it to permanent alimony. Lee v. Lee, 309 So.2d 26 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975).

Affirmed.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and SANDERLIN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HALL, Judge.

We find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding the wife rehabilitative alimony. The facts of this case do not warrant an award of permanent alimony at this time. However, should the wife not become rehabilitated prior to the expiration of the rehabilitative alimony period, she may file a petition to continue the rehabilitative alimony or convert it to permanent alimony. Lee v. Lee, 309 So.2d 26 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975).

Affirmed.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and SANDERLIN, J., concur.

Bowman v. Bowman, 504 So. 2d 808, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 930, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7502 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

504 So. 2d 808 (Bowman v. Bowman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related