Bowman v. Board of Education of the Lawrence Union Free School District No. 15

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bowman v. Board of Education of the Lawrence Union Free School District No. 15

51 A.D.2d 544, 378 N.Y.S.2d 422, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10791

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 19, 1976·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 by petitioner, a tenured teacher employed by respondent, inter alia, to review respondent’s determination, dated July 16, 1974 and made after a hearing, which found him guilty of the charges of "conduct unbecoming a teacher”, "neglect of duty” and "inefficiency”, and dismissed him from his position. Determination modified, on the law, by reducing the penalty to a fine of $4,000. As so modified, determination confirmed, without costs. The findings of respondent are supported by substantial evidence. However, we hold that the punishment of dismissal was so disproportionate to the offense, in light of all the circum[545] stances, as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, 34 NY2d 222, 233). The punishment imposed was excessive to the extent indicated herein and constituted an abuse of discretion. Gulotta, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Martuscello and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 by petitioner, a tenured teacher employed by respondent, inter alia, to review respondent’s determination, dated July 16, 1974 and made after a hearing, which found him guilty of the charges of "conduct unbecoming a teacher”, "neglect of duty” and "inefficiency”, and dismissed him from his position. Determination modified, on the law, by reducing the penalty to a fine of $4,000. As so modified, determination confirmed, without costs. The findings of respondent are supported by substantial evidence. However, we hold that the punishment of dismissal was so disproportionate to the offense, in light of all the circum[545] stances, as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, 34 NY2d 222, 233). The punishment imposed was excessive to the extent indicated herein and constituted an abuse of discretion. Gulotta, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Martuscello and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Bowman v. Board of Education of the Lawrence Union Free School District No. 15, 51 A.D.2d 544, 378 N.Y.S.2d 422, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10791 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

51 A.D.2d 544 (Bowman v. Board of Education of the Lawrence Union Free School District No. 15) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related