Bowlus v. Whatley

56 So. 423, 129 La. 509, 1911 La. LEXIS 781
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided October 30, 1911·No. No. 19,039·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinions

On Motion to Dismiss.

SOMMEERVILLE, J.

[1] Motion has been made to dismiss this application for a writ of review, on tne ground that the record fails to show that rehearing had been asked for in the Court of Appeal, and had been refused, In answer to this motion, counsel for applicant files affidavit to the effect that he instructed the clerk of the Court of Appeal to insert in the record a certified copy of an extract from the minutes, showing that a rehearing had been refused. To the answer to the motion to dismiss is annexed a certified extract from the minutes, reciting that the application for a rehearing had been denied. Under the circumstances, we think that there has been a sufficient compliance with rule 12 (47 South. vii) of this court, and the motion to dismiss is therefore denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bowlus v. Whatley, 56 So. 423, 129 La. 509, 1911 La. LEXIS 781 (La. 1911).

56 So. 423 (Bowlus v. Whatley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Averette v. Jordan
457 So. 2d 691 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1984)
Maleig v. Maleig
435 So. 2d 496 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1983)
Bell v. Bell
339 So. 2d 1333 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1976)
Robinson v. Guedry
181 So. 882 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1938)
Succession of Henry
104 So. 310 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1925)
Castleman v. Smith
86 So. 778 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1920)
Potts v. Potts
77 So. 786 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1918)
Michael v. State ex rel. Welch
50 So. 929 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1909)