Bowling v. Commonwealth
This text of 244 S.W.2d 475 (Bowling v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant, Stanley Bowling, was tried and convicted for selling whisky in local option territory under KRS 242.230. In its brief the Commonwealth admitted the truth of the appellant’s contention that the prosecution failed to offer proof that the alleged offense occurred within twelve months of the indictment as is required by KRS 431.-[476]*476090, and, consequently, concurred in the appellant’s view that the judgment should be reversed.
Since a careful reading of the testimony verifies the opinion of counsel, the appeal is granted and the judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
244 S.W.2d 475, 1951 Ky. LEXIS 1225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowling-v-commonwealth-kyctapp-1951.