Home/Supreme Court/Bowling v. Beaver

Bowling v. Beaver

269 U.S. 527, 46 S. Ct. 17
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 12, 1925
DocketNo. 236
StatusPublished

This text of 269 U.S. 527 (Bowling v. Beaver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bowling v. Beaver, 269 U.S. 527, 46 S. Ct. 17 (1925).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of section 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, sec. 2, 39 Stat. 726; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 5, 6. Mr. Dick Rice for defendants in error, in support of the [528]*528motion.

Messrs. Vern E. Thompson and Halbert H. Mc-Cluer for plaintiffs in error, in- opposition thereto.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. City of Carrollton
252 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 U.S. 527, 46 S. Ct. 17, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowling-v-beaver-scotus-1925.