Bowlin v. Hemphill

179 S.E. 341, 180 Ga. 435, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 282
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 18, 1935·No. No. 10374·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

1. Where the grantor in a first security deed reacquired the property by purchasing the same at a sale under a power contained in such deed, a junior security deed made to another by the same grantor immediately attached as a first claim upon the property, and constituted an encumbrance thereon as against a subsequent grantee of such purchaser, notwithstanding the second deed may have showed upon its face that it was a junior deed. Code of 1933, § 29-111; Hill v. O’Bryan, 104 Ga. 137 (2) (30 S. E. 996) ; Isler v. Griffin, 134 Ga. 192 (4) (67 S. E. 854).

2. Under the above ruling, the petition in this case failed to state a cause of action, and it was error to overrule the general demurrer.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur, except

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bowlin v. Hemphill, 179 S.E. 341, 180 Ga. 435, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 282 (Ga. 1935).

179 S.E. 341 (Bowlin v. Hemphill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Atlanta Trust Co. v. Federal Land Bank
23 S.E.2d 430 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)
Federal Land Bank v. Bank of Lenox
16 S.E.2d 9 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
Perkins v. Rhodes
15 S.E.2d 426 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
Horton v. Johnson
199 S.E. 226 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)
Caffey v. Parris
197 S.E. 898 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)