Bowles v. Winslow

617 P.2d 297, 48 Or. App. 443, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 3506
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedSeptember 29, 1980
DocketNo. 115470, CA 17379
StatusPublished

This text of 617 P.2d 297 (Bowles v. Winslow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bowles v. Winslow, 617 P.2d 297, 48 Or. App. 443, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 3506 (Or. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinion

JOSEPH, P.J.

This is an action for damages for an alleged "overcharge” of attorney’s fees and trustee’s fees in a trust deed foreclosure proceeding. Plaintiff is the obligor on the promissory note and trust deed in question. Defendant, an attorney, acting as trustee and attorney for the trustee, initiated a statutory foreclosure by advertisement and sale after the trust deed obligation had fully matured. After defendant had substantially completed the foreclosure, plaintiff tendered the amount of the obligation, together with the expenses of the trustee, which are not in dispute, and $100 as trustee and attorney’s fees. In making that tender he relied upon ORS 86.760 (1977).1 Defendant refused the tender and insisted upon a trustee’s fee based on ORS 86.7952 and a reasonable attorney’s fee in the amount of $795.

Plaintiff paid the amount demanded by defendant and brought this action. Plaintiff and defendant both moved for summary judgment. Defendant appeals from a summary judgment for plaintiff.

[446]*446In his memorandum opinion on the motions for summary judgment the trial court said:

"The plaintiff relies upon ORS 86.760 and upon section 13 of the trust deed provision to support his position that trustee’s fees and attorney’s fees upon the curing of a default are limited to $50 each.
"The defendant relies upon the case of West Portland Development Co. vs. Ward Cook, Inc., 246 Or 67 [, 424 P2d 212 (1967),] and urges that ORS 86.760 applies only to a situation where a trust deed is in default by reason of acceleration, due to a partial failure to perform.
"In this case, the entire debt was due when the foreclosure by advertisement was commenced.
"Defendant also relies on ORS 86.795 for assessing the trustee’s fees and argues that the attorney is entitled to a reasonable fee by the terms of the promissory note.
"If the statute (ORS 86.760) is capable of two interpretations in this respect, the trust deed provision (Section 13) is not.
"It is clear that the fees are limited to $50.00 each if the default is cured five days before the date of sale.
"The beneficiary elected to sell in accordance with the trust deed provisions and subjected himself to the provisions thereof.
"If the limitation of fees does not apply to this situation, (and it surely does not come under ORS 86.795) there is no provision for payment of attorney’s fees or trustee’s fees.
* * * * »

The trial court was correct.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

West Portland Development Co. v. Ward Cook, Inc.
424 P.2d 212 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
617 P.2d 297, 48 Or. App. 443, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 3506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowles-v-winslow-orctapp-1980.