Bowles v. State

818 So. 2d 556, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 537, 2002 WL 91095
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bowles v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 849 So. 2d 465
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 25, 2002·No. No. 2D01-486·Published

Opinion

DAVIS, Judge.

John Bowles petitions this court for a writ of certiorari to review the circuit court’s denial of his petition for a writ of mandamus. He had filed the mandamus requesting gaintime that he alleges was wrongfully denied.

The trial court denied Bowles’ petition for mandamus for failure to state a prima facie case. Because our review of the record reveals that Bowles did state a prima facie case, we conclude that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law and denied Bowles due process of law. Accordingly, we grant the petition for a writ of certiorari and remand for further proceedings that are consistent with this opinion.

Petition granted.

PARKER and SILBERMAN, J., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bowles v. State, 818 So. 2d 556, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 537, 2002 WL 91095 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

818 So. 2d 556 (Bowles v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.