Bowles v. State, Dep'T Of Corr.
This text of Bowles v. State, Dep'T Of Corr. (Bowles v. State, Dep'T Of Corr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
TRAVIS WILFORD BOWLES, No. 84969 Petitioner, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA FILED DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, OFFENDER MANAGEMENT AUG 1 8 2022 DIVISION, ELIZAMH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT Respondent. BY__ • \ Z_ DV:PUTY6C
ORDER DENYING PETITION
This is a pro se original petition for a writ of mandamus. Having considered the petition, we are not persuaded that our
extraordinary intervention is warranted. See NRS 34.170; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 88 P.3d 840, 841 (2004) (noting that petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted). Petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents CCessential to understand the matters set forth in the petition"). Accordingly,
we ORDER the petition DENIED.
Parraguirre
n L.ewi J. Hardesty Stiglich
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
10.) 1947A -,2523SC9 cc: Travis Wilford Bowles Attorney General/Carson City
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 I 4)47 A
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bowles v. State, Dep'T Of Corr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowles-v-state-dept-of-corr-nev-2022.