Bowles v. State
190 So. 109, 28 Ala. App. 574, 1939 Ala. App. LEXIS 179
This text of 190 So. 109 (Bowles v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bowles v. State, 190 So. 109, 28 Ala. App. 574, 1939 Ala. App. LEXIS 179 (Ala. Ct. App. 1939).
Opinion
The evidence for the State tended to prove the corpus delicti and that the defendant was guilty as charged.
There are no exceptions reserved on the trial, and we find the record to be in all things regular.
There is no error in the record and the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
190 So. 109, 28 Ala. App. 574, 1939 Ala. App. LEXIS 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowles-v-state-alactapp-1939.