Bowles v. State
190 So. 109, 28 Ala. App. 574, 1939 Ala. App. LEXIS 179
Opinion
The evidence for the State tended to prove the corpus delicti and that the defendant was guilty as charged.
There are no exceptions reserved on the trial, and we find the record to be in all things regular.
There is no error in the record and the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bowles v. State, 190 So. 109, 28 Ala. App. 574, 1939 Ala. App. LEXIS 179 (Ala. Ct. App. 1939).
190 So. 109 (Bowles v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.