Bowles v. State
139 So. 911, 25 Ala. App. 605
Opinion
Defendant was convicted of violating the prohibition law and appeals.
This case was tried by the court without a jury. The evidence was in conflict, and, giving to the court’s conclusion the weight to which it is entitled under the law, the judgment must be affirmed. Peterson v. State, 17 Ala. App. 662, 88 So. 49.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bowles v. State, 139 So. 911, 25 Ala. App. 605 (Ala. Ct. App. 1932).
139 So. 911 (Bowles v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Peterson v. State
88 So. 49 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1921)