Bowles v. Palmer
61 N.E. 971, 180 Mass. 169, 1901 Mass. LEXIS 755
This text of 61 N.E. 971 (Bowles v. Palmer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bowles v. Palmer, 61 N.E. 971, 180 Mass. 169, 1901 Mass. LEXIS 755 (Mass. 1901).
Opinion
The statute requires a copy of the declaration to be furnished on demand in all cases where there is an attachment and the declaration is not inserted in the writ. St. [170]*1701894, c. 405. The comma after the word “ particulars ” raises no reasonable doubt that the following words, “ when necessary ” qualify “ bill of particulars ” alone.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Big D Carpets, Inc. v. Welch Group, Inc.
639 N.E.2d 1085 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1994)
Ferguson & Co. v. Melillo
266 Mass. 197 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1929)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
61 N.E. 971, 180 Mass. 169, 1901 Mass. LEXIS 755, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowles-v-palmer-mass-1901.