Bowles v. Lovett

Supreme Court of Georgia

Bowles v. Lovett

374 S.E.2d 202, 258 Ga. 636

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedNovember 2, 1988

Docket46258

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 374 S.E.2d 202 (Bowles v. Lovett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bowles v. Lovett, 374 S.E.2d 202, 258 Ga. 636 (Ga. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

Marshall, Chief Justice.

The only possible basis for this Court’s jurisdiction of this appeal being the equitable issue of specific performance, and this issue no longer being involved in the appeal as a result of the trial court’s untimely-appealed-from final order dismissing the entire complaint, including the specific-performance claim and, by implication, the damages claim — this Court does not have jurisdiction; therefore, the appeal is hereby transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur, except Bell, J., who dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marshall, Chief Justice.

The only possible basis for this Court’s jurisdiction of this appeal being the equitable issue of specific performance, and this issue no longer being involved in the appeal as a result of the trial court’s untimely-appealed-from final order dismissing the entire complaint, including the specific-performance claim and, by implication, the damages claim — this Court does not have jurisdiction; therefore, the appeal is hereby transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur, except Bell, J., who dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

374 S.E.2d 202, 258 Ga. 636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowles-v-lovett-ga-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack