Bowles v. Camillaci

W.D. New York

Bowles v. Camillaci

53 F. Supp. 976, 1943 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1833

District Court, W.D. New York·Decided December 30, 1943·No. Civil Action No. 1439·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

BURKE, District Judge.

The proceeding must be construed as one to punish for civil contempt and as such should be dismissed. McCann v. New York Stock Exchange, 2 Cir., 80 F.2d 211, 214; Federal Trade Commission v. A. McLean & Sons, 7 Cir., 94 F.2d 802.

As suggested in the McCann case, supra, an order should be entered directing the local attorney for the Office of Price Administration to prosecute the defendant criminally on behalf of the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BURKE, District Judge.

The proceeding must be construed as one to punish for civil contempt and as such should be dismissed. McCann v. New York Stock Exchange, 2 Cir., 80 F.2d 211, 214; Federal Trade Commission v. A. McLean & Sons, 7 Cir., 94 F.2d 802.

As suggested in the McCann case, supra, an order should be entered directing the local attorney for the Office of Price Administration to prosecute the defendant criminally on behalf of the Court.

Bowles v. Camillaci, 53 F. Supp. 976, 1943 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1833 (W.D.N.Y. 1943).

Pincite

53 F. Supp. 976 (Bowles v. Camillaci) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related